Tutto in 30 secondi
[was] appunti e note sul mondo islamico contemporaneo

How wrong you are, Slavoj

2013-09-10
By

Slavoj, I am one of your readers.

I am always in agreement with you even if often, I would prefer not to be, I jump right over those pieces in Lacanian and Hegelian that you have the habit of trying to frequently stick in between one serious discussion point and another.

I would like to inform you that your “Syria is a pseudo-struggle” is truly useless for a specific reason: you start off from erroneous assumptions.

You write this false statement: “there are no clear political stakes, no signs of a broad emancipatory-democratic coalition, just a complex network of religious and ethnic alliances overdetermined by the influence of superpowers”.

For you to understand just how much you are in error, you are going to have to do a bit of reading.

I can give you the shortcut by advising you to read the following:

1. this “Non-violence Map in Syrian Uprising”, which you will find at this url http://www.alharak.org/nonviolence_map/en/

2. this “Empowering the Democratic Resistance in Syria”, which you will find here: http://www.arab-reform.net/empowering-democratic-resistance-syria

In both these works you will find those “signs of a broad emancipatory-democratic coalition”.

Fine, there is the proxy war, fair enough reasoning, but in the midst of the various interests of the different countries involved, between two fires, a Syrian civil society and a democratic resistance are already there.

Regards and please, next time be more careful: to fall in love with an argument carries some risks.

Lorenzo Declich

(thanks to Mary Hassan Ali Rizzo for the English translation)

————–

Slavoj, sono un tuo lettore.

Sono sempre d’accordo con te anche se spesso, non me ne vorrai, salto a pié pari quei pezzi in lacanese e hegelese che hai il vizio di voler inserire fra un ragionamento serio e l’altro.

Voglio che tu sappia che hai scritto un pezzo sulla Siria davvero irricevibile per un motivo specifico: parte da assunti sbagliati.

Scrivi questa cosa falsa:

“there are no clear political stakes, no signs of a broad emancipatory-democratic coalition, just a complex network of religious and ethnic alliances overdetermined by the influence of superpowers”

Per capire quanto sbagli dovrai leggere un po’.

La via più breve te la do io, consigliandoti:

1. questa “Non-violence Map in Syrian Uprising”, che trovi a questo indirizzo http://www.alharak.org/nonviolence_map/en/

2. questo “Empowering the Democratic Resistance in Syria”, lo trovi qui: http://www.arab-reform.net/empowering-democratic-resistance-syria

In entrambi questi due lavori troverai quei “segni di un’ampia coalizione emancipatoria-democratica”.

Va bene, c’è la proxy war, bel ragionamento, ma in mezzo agli interessi incrociati dei diversi paesi, fra due fuochi, una società civile siriana e una resistenza democratica ci sono già.

Saluti e la prossima volta sta più attento: innamorarsi di un ragionamento ha i suoi rischi.

Lorenzo Declich

Tags: ,

Lascia un commento

Il tuo indirizzo email non sarà pubblicato.

settembre: 2013
L M M G V S D
« Lug   Ott »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

Archivi

 
'